Road to Season 36: Bears Look to Reclaim Their Contender Status
Mark Miller and Chicago enter Season 36 looking to rebound after consecutive 7-10 seasons.
Caleb Williams
Born: November 18, 2001
Birthplace: Maryland, Washington, DC
College: USC
Drafted: 1st round, pick 1
Years Pro: 2
Develops at the fastest rate. Earns Superstar and Zone abilities.
| PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | SCK | LNG | GP | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
| 10 | 212 | 336 | 63.1% | 2316 | 15 | 3 | 28 | 97 | 10 | 72 | 7.2 | 300 | 4.2 | 30.0 | 5 | 23 | 1 | 6 | 2 | |
While in the pocket, passers with this ability are almost guaranteed to break the first sack attempt by any blitzing defender
Passers with this ability have a greatly improved chance to break the first sack attempt by a blitzing defensive back. Upgrades with BSK and AWR.
Passers with this ability have a greatly reduced chance to be impacted by throw penalties caused by defensive pressure while on the run or with their feet are set in the pocket. Upgrades with BSK, AWR, and TUP.
Passers with this ability have elite accuracy on all unpressured deep throws while their feet are set (except on high throws). Upgrades with DAC, MAC, and THP.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 11 | vs NO |
L 14 - 13 |
15 | 31 | 48.4% | 75.3 | 165 | 81 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | vs TB |
L 34 - 31 |
21 | 34 | 61.8% | 91.1 | 227 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 47 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 8 | @ SEA |
L 23 - 42 |
24 | 39 | 61.5% | 93.5 | 296 | 48 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 7 | vs NE |
L 26 - 17 |
25 | 38 | 65.8% | 94.1 | 280 | 29 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 65 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | @ ATL |
W 10 - 7 |
13 | 22 | 59.1% | 85.9 | 103 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
Latest articles tagged with Caleb Williams
| CAREER | PASSING | RUSHING | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Season | Team | GP | Comp | Att | Pct | Yds | TD | INT | Sck | Lng | QBR | GP | Att | Att/G | Yds | Avg | Yds/G | TD | Lng | Fum | BT | 20+Yds |
| Season 30 |
|
17 | 330 | 548 | 60.2% | 4,353 | 24 | 32 | 30 | 71 | 75.6 | 15 | 53 | 3.5 | 251 | 4.7 | 16.7 | 2 | 24 | 4 | 6 | 1 |
| Season 31 |
|
17 | 287 | 539 | 53.2% | 3,633 | 24 | 16 | 28 | 75 | 77.0 | 17 | 59 | 3.5 | 212 | 3.6 | 12.5 | 2 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| Season 32 |
|
17 | 353 | 561 | 62.9% | 4,763 | 33 | 14 | 17 | 76 | 99.1 | 16 | 66 | 4.1 | 255 | 3.9 | 15.9 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Season 33 |
|
17 | 377 | 553 | 68.2% | 4,840 | 57 | 11 | 30 | 70 | 121.4 | 17 | 67 | 3.9 | 297 | 4.4 | 17.5 | 2 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 0 |
| Season 34 |
|
17 | 307 | 507 | 60.6% | 4,111 | 30 | 9 | 40 | 71 | 98.6 | 16 | 58 | 3.6 | 291 | 5.0 | 18.2 | 0 | 32 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| Season 35 |
|
17 | 306 | 488 | 62.7% | 3,613 | 22 | 12 | 42 | 64 | 89.9 | 16 | 61 | 3.8 | 277 | 4.5 | 17.3 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Season 36 |
|
10 | 212 | 336 | 63.1% | 2,316 | 15 | 3 | 28 | 97 | 94.5 | 10 | 72 | 7.2 | 300 | 4.2 | 30.0 | 5 | 23 | 1 | 6 | 2 |
| Career | — | 112 | 2,172 | 3,532 | 61.5% | 27,629 | 205 | 97 | 215 | 97 | 93.8 | 107 | 436 | 4.1 | 1,883 | 4.3 | 17.6 | 15 | 32 | 19 | 28 | 8 |
| CAREER | PASSING | RUSHING | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Season | Team | GP | Comp | Att | Pct | Yds | TD | INT | Sck | Lng | QBR | GP | Att | Att/G | Yds | Avg | Yds/G | TD | Lng | Fum | BT | 20+Yds |
| Season 32 |
|
4 | 98 | 157 | 62.4% | 1,583 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 53 | 120.5 | 4 | 13 | 3.3 | 46 | 3.5 | 11.5 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Season 33 |
|
2 | 61 | 80 | 76.3% | 691 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 68 | 117.2 | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 25 | 4.2 | 12.5 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Career | — | 6 | 159 | 237 | 67.1% | 2,274 | 19 | 3 | 5 | 68 | 119.4 | 6 | 19 | 3.2 | 71 | 3.7 | 11.8 | 3 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Season 36 | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
| 11 | vs NO |
L 14 - 13 |
15 | 31 | 48.4% | 75.3 | 165 | 81 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4.0 | 5 | 1.3 | 5.0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | vs TB |
L 34 - 31 |
21 | 34 | 61.8% | 91.1 | 227 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 47 | 3.9 | 47.0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | @ SEA |
L 23 - 42 |
24 | 39 | 61.5% | 93.5 | 296 | 48 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6.0 | 18 | 3.0 | 18.0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | vs NE |
L 26 - 17 |
25 | 38 | 65.8% | 94.1 | 280 | 29 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 9.0 | 65 | 7.2 | 65.0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| 6 | @ ATL |
W 10 - 7 |
13 | 22 | 59.1% | 85.9 | 103 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4.0 | 1 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | @ GB |
W 31 - 27 |
20 | 32 | 62.5% | 115.4 | 231 | 57 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 31 | 5.2 | 31.0 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 4 | vs NYJ |
L 34 - 28 |
26 | 34 | 76.5% | 120.4 | 286 | 29 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5.0 | 21 | 4.2 | 21.0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | vs PHI |
L 27 - 10 |
22 | 39 | 56.4% | 57.4 | 278 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9.0 | 28 | 3.1 | 28.0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | vs MIN |
W 3 - 27 |
26 | 37 | 70.3% | 100.8 | 197 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8.0 | 48 | 6.0 | 48.0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | @ CAR |
W 27 - 13 |
20 | 30 | 66.7% | 114.9 | 253 | 97 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 9.0 | 36 | 4.0 | 36.0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 212 | 336 | 63.1% | 94.5 | 2,316 | 97 | 15 | 3 | 28 | 72 | 7.2 | 300 | 4.2 | 30.0 | 5 | 23 | 1 | 6 | 2 | ||
Ratings by category