Steelers Take Control After Early Chaos, Top Ravens 41–23 in AFC North Showdown
Jaylen Warren powered Pittsburgh past Baltimore as turnovers and explosive runs decided a massive AFC North showdown in Week 14.
Lamar Jackson
Born: January 7, 1997
Birthplace: Florida, Pompano Beach
College: Louisville
Drafted: 1st round, pick 32
Years Pro: 8
Develops at the fastest rate. Earns Superstar and Zone abilities.
| PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | SCK | LNG | GP | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
| 17 | 271 | 377 | 71.9% | 2836 | 24 | 4 | 23 | 57 | 17 | 101 | 5.9 | 588 | 5.8 | 34.6 | 8 | 43 | 0 | 15 | 4 | |
The most effective ball carriers prioritize maintaining possession over all else. When they enter the zone, no tackles made against them will result in a fumble.
Passers with this ability receive better blocking support on designed quarterback run plays.
Passers with this ability have faster passing animations when they are throwing under pressure
Ballcarriers with this ability have steerable juke animations.
Passers with this ability improve the catching prowess of all tight ends who are open on pass plays.
While in the pocket, passers with this ability are almost guaranteed to evade the first sack attempt by a blitzing defensive back.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| W.C. | @ KC |
L 23 - 28 |
22 | 30 | 73.3% | 101.9 | 199 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 102 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 18 | @ PIT |
L 34 - 35 |
16 | 21 | 76.2% | 86.2 | 124 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 76 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ GB |
L 17 - 20 |
18 | 29 | 62.1% | 96.6 | 138 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 56 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs NE |
W 16 - 21 |
14 | 24 | 58.3% | 92.5 | 161 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | @ CIN |
W 24 - 17 |
15 | 18 | 83.3% | 104.1 | 182 | 57 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 1 | 0 | ||
Latest articles tagged with Lamar Jackson
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| W.C. | @ KC |
L 23 - 28 |
22 | 30 | 73.3% | 101.9 | 199 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 102 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 18 | @ PIT |
L 34 - 35 |
16 | 21 | 76.2% | 86.2 | 124 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 76 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ GB |
L 17 - 20 |
18 | 29 | 62.1% | 96.6 | 138 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 56 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs NE |
W 16 - 21 |
14 | 24 | 58.3% | 92.5 | 161 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | @ CIN |
W 24 - 17 |
15 | 18 | 83.3% | 104.1 | 182 | 57 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 14 | vs PIT |
L 41 - 23 |
21 | 27 | 77.8% | 124.8 | 217 | 46 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 65 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 13 | vs CIN |
W 17 - 23 |
18 | 25 | 72.0% | 122.9 | 205 | 27 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 12 | vs NYJ |
W 21 - 24 |
15 | 24 | 62.5% | 110.5 | 165 | 29 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 45 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 11 | @ CLE |
W 21 - 19 |
12 | 19 | 63.2% | 115.0 | 115 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 10 | @ MIN |
W 16 - 14 |
20 | 25 | 80.0% | 110.3 | 182 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | @ MIA |
L 17 - 34 |
7 | 10 | 70.0% | 81.2 | 50 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 8 | vs CHI |
W 23 - 31 |
21 | 29 | 72.4% | 106.3 | 226 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 26 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 6 | vs LAR |
L 28 - 10 |
14 | 26 | 53.8% | 65.2 | 134 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 32 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | vs HOU |
W 19 - 28 |
15 | 20 | 75.0% | 119.7 | 205 | 28 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 47 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4 | @ KC |
W 42 - 14 |
17 | 22 | 77.3% | 113.2 | 167 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 3 | vs DET |
W 3 - 24 |
15 | 18 | 83.3% | 130.0 | 194 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 32 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2 | vs CLE |
W 13 - 28 |
16 | 19 | 84.2% | 141.9 | 163 | 26 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 31 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | @ BUF |
W 35 - 13 |
17 | 21 | 81.0% | 123.8 | 208 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 74 | 3 | 0 | ||
Ratings by category