Jared Goff
Born: October 14, 1994
Birthplace: California, Novato
College: California
Drafted: 1st round, pick 1
Years Pro: 10
Develops at a faster than normal rate.
| PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | SCK | LNG | GP | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
 |
17 | 341 | 493 | 69.2% | 3781 | 19 | 7 | 50 | 80 | 16 | 31 | 1.9 | 100 | 3.2 | 6.3 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This player has no X-Factor or Superstar abilities.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 18 | @ CHI |
L 21 - 24 |
20 | 28 | 71.4% | 93.7 | 216 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ MIN |
W 28 - 24 |
17 | 26 | 65.4% | 120.6 | 240 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs PIT |
L 37 - 21 |
22 | 32 | 68.8% | 94.1 | 187 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | @ LAR |
W 34 - 17 |
21 | 27 | 77.8% | 151.6 | 294 | 80 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 14 | vs DAL |
L 17 - 13 |
24 | 33 | 72.7% | 93.4 | 244 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Latest articles tagged with Jared Goff
The 49ers survived the first double-overtime playoff game in 2KOLF history, defeating the Lions 34-28 in an instant classic.
Jared Goff completed 30 of 32 and Jahmyr Gibbs scored twice as Detroit beat Chicago 29–7 behind defense at Ford Field.
Netflix's Quarterback returns with behind-the-scenes access to three top QBs, offering an intimate look at their journeys.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 18 | @ CHI |
L 21 - 24 |
20 | 28 | 71.4% | 93.7 | 216 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ MIN |
W 28 - 24 |
17 | 26 | 65.4% | 120.6 | 240 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs PIT |
L 37 - 21 |
22 | 32 | 68.8% | 94.1 | 187 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | @ LAR |
W 34 - 17 |
21 | 27 | 77.8% | 151.6 | 294 | 80 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 14 | vs DAL |
L 17 - 13 |
24 | 33 | 72.7% | 93.4 | 244 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 13 | vs GB |
L 17 - 10 |
18 | 30 | 60.0% | 48.4 | 174 | 27 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 16 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 12 | vs NYG |
W 10 - 45 |
21 | 28 | 75.0% | 110.2 | 227 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 11 | @ PHI |
L 27 - 38 |
18 | 29 | 62.1% | 78.3 | 191 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 10 | @ WAS |
L 22 - 28 |
18 | 24 | 75.0% | 147.3 | 249 | 44 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | vs MIN |
W 13 - 24 |
12 | 18 | 66.7% | 74.7 | 174 | 28 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 7 | vs TB |
L 34 - 6 |
12 | 27 | 44.4% | 26.9 | 121 | 26 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | @ KC |
L 14 - 28 |
22 | 36 | 61.1% | 87.6 | 219 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | @ CIN |
W 36 - 26 |
24 | 33 | 72.7% | 129.1 | 286 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4 | vs CLE |
L 24 - 21 |
26 | 37 | 70.3% | 104.2 | 307 | 52 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | @ BAL |
L 3 - 24 |
20 | 29 | 69.0% | 78.0 | 229 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2 | vs CHI |
W 7 - 29 |
30 | 32 | 93.8% | 109.6 | 250 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | @ GB |
W 17 - 14 |
16 | 24 | 66.7% | 101.5 | 173 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
Ratings by category