Anthony Richardson Sr
Born: May 22, 2002
Birthplace: Florida, Gainesville
College: Florida
Drafted: 1st round, pick 4
Years Pro: 3
Develops at a normal rate.
| PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | SCK | LNG | GP | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
 |
17 | 311 | 492 | 63.2% | 3561 | 21 | 11 | 42 | 72 | 17 | 112 | 6.6 | 762 | 6.8 | 44.8 | 6 | 50 | 6 | 14 | 10 |
This player has no X-Factor or Superstar abilities.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 18 | @ HOU |
L 28 - 34 |
21 | 30 | 70.0% | 99.5 | 222 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 41 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | vs JAX |
L 24 - 3 |
12 | 21 | 57.1% | 76.2 | 134 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs SF |
L 31 - 21 |
11 | 21 | 52.4% | 69.3 | 119 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 91 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 15 | @ SEA |
L 7 - 14 |
21 | 34 | 61.8% | 74.7 | 193 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 14 | @ JAX |
L 24 - 31 |
20 | 32 | 62.5% | 104.2 | 225 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 40 | 0 | 0 | ||
Latest articles tagged with Anthony Richardson
Anthony Richardson accounted for three touchdowns as the Colts defeated the Falcons 31–19 in Berlin’s International Series matchup.
Miami opened the season strong, beating Indianapolis 31–24 behind Tua Tagovailoa, Tyreek Hill, and Darren Waller, while Anthony Richardson impressed.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 18 | @ HOU |
L 28 - 34 |
21 | 30 | 70.0% | 99.5 | 222 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 41 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | vs JAX |
L 24 - 3 |
12 | 21 | 57.1% | 76.2 | 134 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs SF |
L 31 - 21 |
11 | 21 | 52.4% | 69.3 | 119 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 91 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 15 | @ SEA |
L 7 - 14 |
21 | 34 | 61.8% | 74.7 | 193 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 14 | @ JAX |
L 24 - 31 |
20 | 32 | 62.5% | 104.2 | 225 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 40 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 13 | vs HOU |
W 10 - 24 |
25 | 36 | 69.4% | 90.0 | 260 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 23 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 12 | @ KC |
L 10 - 31 |
18 | 26 | 69.2% | 77.8 | 213 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 10 | vs ATL |
W 21 - 31 |
12 | 22 | 54.5% | 107.9 | 259 | 72 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 90 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 9 | @ PIT |
L 20 - 21 |
10 | 19 | 52.6% | 47.9 | 109 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 85 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 8 | vs TEN |
W 21 - 24 |
21 | 32 | 65.6% | 107.8 | 232 | 31 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 40 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 7 | @ LAC |
W 30 - 24 |
25 | 39 | 64.1% | 70.2 | 258 | 26 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 51 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | vs ARI |
W 24 - 29 |
22 | 38 | 57.9% | 68.4 | 185 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | vs LV |
W 29 - 36 |
15 | 25 | 60.0% | 78.9 | 181 | 51 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 114 | 3 | 0 | ||
| 4 | @ LAR |
W 35 - 28 |
19 | 32 | 59.4% | 114.0 | 240 | 47 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | @ TEN |
L 25 - 28 |
20 | 32 | 62.5% | 100.3 | 215 | 32 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 23 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2 | vs DEN |
W 13 - 20 |
22 | 31 | 71.0% | 106.7 | 259 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 1 | vs MIA |
L 31 - 24 |
17 | 22 | 77.3% | 126.5 | 257 | 42 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 83 | 1 | 3 | ||
Ratings by category