Jake Moody
Born: November 23, 1999
Birthplace: Michigan, Northville
College: Michigan
Drafted: 3rd round, pick 38
Years Pro: 3
Develops at a normal rate.
| PUNTING | KICKING | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | PUNTS | YDS | AVG | LNG | IN20 | IN20% | TB | TB% | BLK | NET | NET AVG | GP | FGM | FGA | PCT | LNG | 50+ATT | 50+M | XPM | XPA | PCT | PTS | KO | TB | |
 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 16 | 21 | 76.2% | 52 | 5 | 3 | 57 | 57 | 100.0% | 105 | 0 | 0 | |
This player has no X-Factor or Superstar abilities.
| GAME LOGS | FIELD GOALS | PAT | KICKOFFS | |||||||||||
| WEEK | GAME | RESULT | FGM | FGA | PCT | LNG | 50+ATT | 50+M | XPM | XPA | PCT | PTS | KO | TB |
| Div. | vs GB |
L 32 - 31 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 54 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| W.C. | vs SEA |
W 18 - 26 |
2 | 2 | 100.0% | 45 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 66.7% | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | vs SEA |
L 34 - 10 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 24 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | vs CHI |
W 28 - 31 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 28 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | @ IND |
W 31 - 21 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 52 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Latest articles tagged with Jake Moody
Steelers outlasts Chargers 35-34 after Isaac Burr’s late touchdown pass and Jake Moody’s missed 57-yard field goal.
San Francisco erupts for 51 as Purdy and Kittle shine, defense scores twice, and Jeff Jarin’s 49ers overwhelm Jacksonville at Levi’s.
| GAME LOGS | FIELD GOALS | PAT | KICKOFFS | |||||||||||
| WEEK | GAME | RESULT | FGM | FGA | PCT | LNG | 50+ATT | 50+M | XPM | XPA | PCT | PTS | KO | TB |
| 1 | @ SEA |
L 23 - 30 |
0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | @ NO |
L 10 - 31 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | vs ARI |
L 24 - 18 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 51 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | vs JAX |
W 20 - 51 |
3 | 3 | 100.0% | 51 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 100.0% | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | @ LAR |
W 38 - 21 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 32 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 100.0% | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | @ TB |
W 28 - 21 |
0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | vs ATL |
L 27 - 21 |
0 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | @ HOU |
W 24 - 21 |
0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | @ NYG |
W 24 - 20 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 46 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | vs LAR |
W 3 - 34 |
2 | 3 | 66.7% | 41 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | @ ARI |
W 35 - 31 |
0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 100.0% | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | vs CAR |
W 23 - 28 |
0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | @ CLE |
W 31 - 13 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 44 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | vs TEN |
W 7 - 44 |
3 | 3 | 100.0% | 42 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 100.0% | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | @ IND |
W 31 - 21 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 52 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | vs CHI |
W 28 - 31 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 28 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | vs SEA |
L 34 - 10 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 24 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| W.C. | vs SEA |
W 18 - 26 |
2 | 2 | 100.0% | 45 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 66.7% | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Div. | vs GB |
L 32 - 31 |
1 | 1 | 100.0% | 54 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Ratings by category