Brian Donahue
Born: February 25, 1991
Birthplace: Colorado
College: North Dakota State
Drafted: 2nd round, pick 6
Years Pro: 0
Develops at a faster rate. Earns Superstar abilities.
| PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | SCK | LNG | GP | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
 |
17 | 342 | 559 | 61.2% | 4206 | 32 | 7 | 38 | 94 | 14 | 42 | 3.0 | 108 | 2.6 | 7.7 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Passers with this ability improve the catching prowess of all running backs who are open on pass plays.
Passers with this ability have faster passing animations when they are throwing under pressure
When playing from behind, players with this ability can easily enter the Zone.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| W.C. | @ DET |
L 6 - 31 |
12 | 20 | 60.0% | 35.4 | 110 | 23 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 18 | vs ARI |
W 6 - 12 |
13 | 27 | 48.1% | 81.7 | 176 | 64 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ CLE |
W 38 - 20 |
23 | 30 | 76.7% | 137.3 | 229 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | @ IND |
W 28 - 17 |
18 | 26 | 69.2% | 125.3 | 262 | 63 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | @ SEA |
W 12 - 10 |
18 | 36 | 50.0% | 66.7 | 199 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | ||
Latest articles tagged with Brian Donahue
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| W.C. | @ DET |
L 6 - 31 |
12 | 20 | 60.0% | 35.4 | 110 | 23 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 18 | vs ARI |
W 6 - 12 |
13 | 27 | 48.1% | 81.7 | 176 | 64 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ CLE |
W 38 - 20 |
23 | 30 | 76.7% | 137.3 | 229 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | @ IND |
W 28 - 17 |
18 | 26 | 69.2% | 125.3 | 262 | 63 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | @ SEA |
W 12 - 10 |
18 | 36 | 50.0% | 66.7 | 199 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 14 | vs DAL |
L 43 - 39 |
21 | 33 | 63.6% | 115.7 | 320 | 72 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 13 | vs LAR |
L 34 - 31 |
16 | 27 | 59.3% | 140.5 | 349 | 94 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 12 | @ WAS |
W 27 - 21 |
29 | 44 | 65.9% | 94.7 | 259 | 25 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 11 | @ PHI |
W 27 - 17 |
21 | 24 | 87.5% | 126.2 | 263 | 61 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 10 | vs TEN |
L 27 - 9 |
16 | 32 | 50.0% | 70.9 | 209 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | @ DAL |
L 17 - 19 |
28 | 45 | 62.2% | 95.4 | 288 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 8 | vs MIN |
W 11 - 27 |
17 | 32 | 53.1% | 92.8 | 197 | 27 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | vs HOU |
W 31 - 32 |
33 | 44 | 75.0% | 115.1 | 414 | 49 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | @ TB |
L 10 - 17 |
17 | 35 | 48.6% | 57.2 | 243 | 56 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4 | vs PHI |
W 20 - 22 |
18 | 34 | 52.9% | 92.2 | 216 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | vs WAS |
L 34 - 14 |
19 | 28 | 67.9% | 97.0 | 258 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 2 | @ JAX |
W 24 - 7 |
15 | 27 | 55.6% | 111.0 | 166 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | @ SF |
L 9 - 31 |
20 | 35 | 57.1% | 56.6 | 158 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -6 | 0 | 0 | ||
Ratings by category
