Cam Ward
Born: May 25, 2002
Birthplace: Texas, West Columbia
College: Miami
Drafted: 1st round, pick 1
Years Pro: 1
Develops at a faster than normal rate.
| PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | SCK | LNG | GP | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
 |
17 | 279 | 468 | 59.6% | 3218 | 20 | 26 | 27 | 77 | 16 | 65 | 4.1 | 293 | 4.5 | 18.3 | 5 | 87 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
This player has no X-Factor or Superstar abilities.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| W.C. | vs MIA |
L 34 - 23 |
16 | 23 | 69.6% | 130.1 | 227 | 29 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 18 | @ JAX |
W 17 - 7 |
18 | 28 | 64.3% | 67.5 | 200 | 27 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | vs NO |
W 21 - 24 |
20 | 28 | 71.4% | 78.4 | 219 | 28 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs KC |
L 41 - 10 |
10 | 21 | 47.6% | 21.2 | 96 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 15 | @ SF |
L 7 - 44 |
18 | 31 | 58.1% | 51.8 | 225 | 77 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 0 | ||
Latest articles tagged with Cam Ward
San Francisco responded to an early Titans strike with 44 unanswered points, dominating in the rain to strengthen their NFC playoff push.
Titans ride 223 rushing yards and five interceptions to a 30–14 win over Raiders, seizing control late in the fourth.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| W.C. | vs MIA |
L 34 - 23 |
16 | 23 | 69.6% | 130.1 | 227 | 29 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 18 | @ JAX |
W 17 - 7 |
18 | 28 | 64.3% | 67.5 | 200 | 27 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | vs NO |
W 21 - 24 |
20 | 28 | 71.4% | 78.4 | 219 | 28 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs KC |
L 41 - 10 |
10 | 21 | 47.6% | 21.2 | 96 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 15 | @ SF |
L 7 - 44 |
18 | 31 | 58.1% | 51.8 | 225 | 77 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 14 | @ CLE |
W 18 - 17 |
14 | 29 | 48.3% | 76.0 | 155 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 13 | vs JAX |
W 13 - 21 |
12 | 20 | 60.0% | 68.5 | 99 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 12 | vs SEA |
L 20 - 19 |
22 | 41 | 53.7% | 65.2 | 222 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 11 | vs HOU |
W 21 - 35 |
21 | 29 | 72.4% | 141.3 | 309 | 70 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 19 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | vs LAC |
W 10 - 30 |
16 | 27 | 59.3% | 114.7 | 250 | 62 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 8 | @ IND |
L 21 - 24 |
14 | 18 | 77.8% | 88.4 | 185 | 21 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 7 | vs NE |
L 28 - 22 |
16 | 27 | 59.3% | 64.2 | 123 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 24 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | @ LV |
W 30 - 14 |
9 | 15 | 60.0% | 42.9 | 67 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 91 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 5 | @ ARI |
L 20 - 24 |
20 | 34 | 58.8% | 93.1 | 183 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4 | @ HOU |
L 10 - 21 |
19 | 34 | 55.9% | 80.1 | 277 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | vs IND |
W 25 - 28 |
16 | 28 | 57.1% | 61.7 | 181 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 2 | vs LAR |
L 37 - 23 |
19 | 37 | 51.4% | 37.3 | 233 | 28 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | @ DEN |
W 35 - 29 |
15 | 21 | 71.4% | 96.1 | 194 | 46 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
Ratings by category