Bo Nix
Born: February 25, 1999
Birthplace: Alabama, Pinson
College: Oregon
Drafted: 1st round, pick 12
Years Pro: 2
Develops at a faster than normal rate.
| PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | SCK | LNG | GP | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
 |
17 | 339 | 536 | 63.2% | 4280 | 33 | 16 | 35 | 92 | 16 | 40 | 2.5 | 236 | 5.9 | 14.8 | 0 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
This player has no X-Factor or Superstar abilities.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 18 | vs LAC |
L 30 - 15 |
19 | 33 | 57.6% | 66.6 | 271 | 27 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ KC |
L 7 - 16 |
24 | 42 | 57.1% | 80.8 | 234 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 34 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs JAX |
L 21 - 13 |
20 | 34 | 58.8% | 69.9 | 254 | 31 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | vs GB |
L 34 - 29 |
26 | 32 | 81.3% | 136.5 | 297 | 43 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 14 | @ LV |
L 23 - 30 |
16 | 34 | 47.1% | 76.5 | 208 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 45 | 0 | 1 | ||
Latest articles tagged with Bo Nix
Ashton Jeanty’s two rushing TDs, including an 80-yard burst, powered the Raiders past Denver 30–23 in Week 14.
Denver’s defense recorded five sacks and two interceptions as the Broncos edged the Raiders 16–14 on Thursday night to end their losing...
Dallas edged Denver 39–35 in a wild Week 8 showdown, powered by Dak Prescott’s poise and Jaydon Blue’s three touchdowns.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 18 | vs LAC |
L 30 - 15 |
19 | 33 | 57.6% | 66.6 | 271 | 27 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ KC |
L 7 - 16 |
24 | 42 | 57.1% | 80.8 | 234 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 34 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs JAX |
L 21 - 13 |
20 | 34 | 58.8% | 69.9 | 254 | 31 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | vs GB |
L 34 - 29 |
26 | 32 | 81.3% | 136.5 | 297 | 43 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 14 | @ LV |
L 23 - 30 |
16 | 34 | 47.1% | 76.5 | 208 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 45 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 13 | @ WAS |
L 12 - 28 |
15 | 25 | 60.0% | 68.7 | 220 | 28 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 11 | vs KC |
W 24 - 29 |
27 | 41 | 65.9% | 110.6 | 308 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 10 | vs LV |
W 14 - 16 |
14 | 17 | 82.4% | 122.7 | 149 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 49 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | @ HOU |
L 13 - 31 |
12 | 26 | 46.2% | 71.9 | 216 | 92 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 8 | vs DAL |
L 39 - 35 |
21 | 36 | 58.3% | 122.6 | 382 | 37 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 7 | vs NYG |
L 22 - 14 |
18 | 34 | 52.9% | 54.7 | 233 | 44 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | @ NYJ |
W 21 - 14 |
27 | 33 | 81.8% | 86.1 | 274 | 28 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | @ PHI |
W 30 - 24 |
19 | 29 | 65.5% | 101.2 | 250 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4 | vs CIN |
W 28 - 31 |
24 | 31 | 77.4% | 131.6 | 244 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | @ LAC |
W 42 - 28 |
22 | 34 | 64.7% | 138.4 | 353 | 68 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2 | @ IND |
L 13 - 20 |
15 | 24 | 62.5% | 93.2 | 145 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | vs TEN |
L 35 - 29 |
20 | 31 | 64.5% | 107.1 | 242 | 41 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | ||
Ratings by category