Malik Nabers
Born: July 28, 2003
Birthplace: Louisiana, Youngsville
College: LSU
Drafted: 1st round, pick 6
Years Pro: 2
Develops at a faster rate. Earns Superstar abilities.
| RECEIVING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | REC | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | YAC | TD | LNG | TGT | DROPS | PCT | GP | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
 |
16 | 64 | 899 | 14.0 | 56.2 | 181 | 2 | 56 | 66 | 2 | 97.0% | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Receivers with this ability catch more consistently while catching passes 10-20 yards from the LoS, inside the numbers
Receivers with this ability catch more consistently while catching passes 10-20 yards from the LoS, outside the numbers
After securing a RAC catch, ballcarriers with this ability can quickly shift momentum, change direction, and turn the corner without sacrificing speed.
| GAME LOGS | RECEIVING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | REC | DPS | TGT | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 18 | vs DAL |
W 21 - 33 |
6 | 1 | 7 | 95 | 15.8 | 51 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ LV |
L 21 - 43 |
3 | 0 | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs MIN |
W 21 - 22 |
7 | 0 | 7 | 54 | 7.7 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | vs WAS |
W 24 - 25 |
7 | 0 | 7 | 98 | 14.0 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 13 | @ NE |
L 14 - 24 |
4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Latest articles tagged with Malik Nabers
| GAME LOGS | RECEIVING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | REC | DPS | TGT | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 1 | @ WAS |
L 22 - 28 |
3 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2 | @ DAL |
L 30 - 36 |
2 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 11.0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | vs KC |
W 24 - 27 |
5 | 0 | 5 | 65 | 13.0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | @ NO |
L 10 - 17 |
1 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | vs PHI |
W 13 - 31 |
5 | 0 | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 7 | @ DEN |
W 22 - 14 |
3 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 8 | @ PHI |
L 21 - 23 |
2 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | vs SF |
L 24 - 20 |
2 | 0 | 2 | 66 | 33.0 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 10 | @ CHI |
L 42 - 45 |
6 | 0 | 6 | 149 | 24.8 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 11 | vs GB |
L 27 - 6 |
5 | 0 | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 12 | @ DET |
L 10 - 45 |
3 | 0 | 3 | 39 | 13.0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 13 | @ NE |
L 14 - 24 |
4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | vs WAS |
W 24 - 25 |
7 | 0 | 7 | 98 | 14.0 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs MIN |
W 21 - 22 |
7 | 0 | 7 | 54 | 7.7 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ LV |
L 21 - 43 |
3 | 0 | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 18 | vs DAL |
W 21 - 33 |
6 | 1 | 7 | 95 | 15.8 | 51 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Ratings by category
