J.J. McCarthy
Born: January 20, 2003
Birthplace: Illinois, La Grange Park
College: Michigan
Drafted: 1st round, pick 10
Years Pro: 2
Develops at a faster than normal rate.
| PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | SCK | LNG | GP | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
 |
17 | 311 | 502 | 62.0% | 3819 | 27 | 7 | 35 | 70 | 17 | 57 | 3.4 | 288 | 5.1 | 16.9 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
This player has no X-Factor or Superstar abilities.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 18 | vs GB |
W 10 - 17 |
20 | 37 | 54.1% | 77.7 | 192 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | vs DET |
L 28 - 24 |
22 | 35 | 62.9% | 100.2 | 225 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | @ NYG |
L 21 - 22 |
17 | 23 | 73.9% | 94.4 | 210 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 15 | @ DAL |
W 45 - 27 |
21 | 30 | 70.0% | 152.0 | 376 | 70 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 14 | vs WAS |
L 27 - 24 |
20 | 42 | 47.6% | 56.8 | 272 | 26 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 0 | ||
Latest articles tagged with J.J. McCarthy
Minnesota dominated Thursday Night Primetime, outscoring Dallas behind J.J. McCarthy’s big night to spoil the Cowboys’ push for NFC supremacy.
Minnesota outlasted Chicago in a 46–43 shootout, fueled by explosive touchdowns, defensive swings, and a dramatic fourth-quarter push.
Steelers’ rushing trio dominated in Dublin, combining for four touchdowns as Pittsburgh overpowered the Vikings 42–23 at Aviva Stadium.
On Sunday night, Atlanta stunned Minnesota 35-31 as Michael Penix Jr. hit Drake London with one second left in regulation.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 18 | vs GB |
W 10 - 17 |
20 | 37 | 54.1% | 77.7 | 192 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | vs DET |
L 28 - 24 |
22 | 35 | 62.9% | 100.2 | 225 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | @ NYG |
L 21 - 22 |
17 | 23 | 73.9% | 94.4 | 210 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 15 | @ DAL |
W 45 - 27 |
21 | 30 | 70.0% | 152.0 | 376 | 70 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 14 | vs WAS |
L 27 - 24 |
20 | 42 | 47.6% | 56.8 | 272 | 26 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 13 | @ SEA |
W 21 - 17 |
18 | 30 | 60.0% | 92.4 | 211 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 12 | @ GB |
L 10 - 45 |
15 | 34 | 44.1% | 52.0 | 208 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 11 | vs CHI |
W 43 - 46 |
26 | 36 | 72.2% | 129.3 | 340 | 68 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 49 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 10 | vs BAL |
L 16 - 14 |
12 | 21 | 57.1% | 109.2 | 140 | 27 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | @ DET |
L 13 - 24 |
13 | 27 | 48.1% | 68.4 | 190 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 8 | @ LAC |
W 26 - 20 |
27 | 38 | 71.1% | 109.6 | 281 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 7 | vs PHI |
W 17 - 31 |
17 | 24 | 70.8% | 109.8 | 201 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 5 | @ CLE |
L 13 - 17 |
14 | 25 | 56.0% | 89.2 | 163 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4 | @ PIT |
L 23 - 42 |
16 | 25 | 64.0% | 100.0 | 188 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | vs CIN |
L 30 - 28 |
20 | 33 | 60.6% | 81.7 | 171 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 2 | vs ATL |
L 35 - 31 |
22 | 23 | 95.7% | 147.7 | 326 | 48 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 1 | @ CHI |
L 13 - 20 |
11 | 19 | 57.9% | 95.2 | 125 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
Ratings by category