Road to Season 36: Bears Look to Reclaim Their Contender Status
Mark Miller and Chicago enter Season 36 looking to rebound after consecutive 7-10 seasons.
Caleb Williams
Born: November 18, 2001
Birthplace: Maryland, Washington, DC
College: USC
Drafted: 1st round, pick 1
Years Pro: 3
Develops at the fastest rate. Earns Superstar and Zone abilities.
| PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | SCK | LNG | GP | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
| 17 | 306 | 488 | 62.7% | 3613 | 22 | 12 | 42 | 64 | 16 | 61 | 3.8 | 277 | 4.5 | 17.3 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | |
The best quarterbacks learn to take calculated risks. When they enter the zone, they can't be intercepted (by AI defenders) and have increased throw speed.
Passers with this ability have perfect accuracy on all unpressured throws while their feet are set in the pocket (except on high/low throws).
Passers with this ability have faster passing animations when they are throwing under pressure
When playing from behind, players with this ability can easily enter the Zone.
Passers with this ability have perfect accuracy on all throws under 40 yards while running outside the pocket (except on high/low throws).
Passers with this ability receive better pass blocking from their offensive linemen.
| GAME LOGS | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | YDS | TD | FUM | ||
| 18 | @ ATL |
L 17 - 22 |
20 | 36 | 55.6% | 83.1 | 240 | 33 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | @ LAC |
L 3 - 20 |
14 | 30 | 46.7% | 46.6 | 141 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | vs SEA |
L 38 - 3 |
13 | 25 | 52.0% | 55.0 | 158 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 15 | @ MIN |
L 6 - 9 |
14 | 29 | 48.3% | 61.2 | 132 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 14 | vs DET |
L 31 - 28 |
22 | 31 | 71.0% | 101.6 | 241 | 28 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | ||
Latest articles tagged with Caleb Williams
| CAREER | PASSING | RUSHING | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Season | Team | GP | Comp | Att | Pct | Yds | TD | INT | Sck | Lng | QBR | GP | Att | Att/G | Yds | Avg | Yds/G | TD | Lng | Fum | BT | 20+Yds |
| Season 30 |
|
17 | 330 | 548 | 60.2% | 4,353 | 24 | 32 | 30 | 71 | 75.6 | 15 | 53 | 3.5 | 251 | 4.7 | 16.7 | 2 | 24 | 4 | 6 | 1 |
| Season 31 |
|
17 | 287 | 539 | 53.2% | 3,633 | 24 | 16 | 28 | 75 | 77.0 | 17 | 59 | 3.5 | 212 | 3.6 | 12.5 | 2 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| Season 32 |
|
17 | 353 | 561 | 62.9% | 4,763 | 33 | 14 | 17 | 76 | 99.1 | 16 | 66 | 4.1 | 255 | 3.9 | 15.9 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Season 33 |
|
17 | 377 | 553 | 68.2% | 4,840 | 57 | 11 | 30 | 70 | 121.4 | 17 | 67 | 3.9 | 297 | 4.4 | 17.5 | 2 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 0 |
| Season 34 |
|
17 | 307 | 507 | 60.6% | 4,111 | 30 | 9 | 40 | 71 | 98.6 | 16 | 58 | 3.6 | 291 | 5.0 | 18.2 | 0 | 32 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| Season 35 |
|
17 | 306 | 488 | 62.7% | 3,613 | 22 | 12 | 42 | 64 | 89.9 | 16 | 61 | 3.8 | 277 | 4.5 | 17.3 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Career | — | 102 | 1,960 | 3,196 | 61.3% | 25,313 | 190 | 94 | 187 | 76 | 93.7 | 97 | 364 | 3.8 | 1,583 | 4.3 | 16.3 | 10 | 32 | 18 | 22 | 6 |
| CAREER | PASSING | RUSHING | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Season | Team | GP | Comp | Att | Pct | Yds | TD | INT | Sck | Lng | QBR | GP | Att | Att/G | Yds | Avg | Yds/G | TD | Lng | Fum | BT | 20+Yds |
| Season 32 |
|
4 | 98 | 157 | 62.4% | 1,583 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 53 | 120.5 | 4 | 13 | 3.3 | 46 | 3.5 | 11.5 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Season 33 |
|
2 | 61 | 80 | 76.3% | 691 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 68 | 117.2 | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 25 | 4.2 | 12.5 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Career | — | 6 | 159 | 237 | 67.1% | 2,274 | 19 | 3 | 5 | 68 | 119.4 | 6 | 19 | 3.2 | 71 | 3.7 | 11.8 | 3 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Season 35 | PASSING | RUSHING | |||||||||||||||||||
| WEEK | OPP | RESULTS | COMP | ATT | PCT | QBR | YDS | LNG | TD | INT | SCK | ATT | ATT/G | YDS | AVG | YDS/G | TD | LNG | FUM | BT | 20+YDS |
| 18 | @ ATL |
L 17 - 22 |
20 | 36 | 55.6% | 83.1 | 240 | 33 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2.0 | 11 | 5.5 | 11.0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 17 | @ LAC |
L 3 - 20 |
14 | 30 | 46.7% | 46.6 | 141 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 2.0 | 16 | 8.0 | 16.0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | vs SEA |
L 38 - 3 |
13 | 25 | 52.0% | 55.0 | 158 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2.0 | 8 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | @ MIN |
L 6 - 9 |
14 | 29 | 48.3% | 61.2 | 132 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3.0 | 10 | 3.3 | 10.0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | vs DET |
L 31 - 28 |
22 | 31 | 71.0% | 101.6 | 241 | 28 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | 11 | 5.5 | 11.0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | vs GB |
L 21 - 17 |
23 | 39 | 59.0% | 76.0 | 252 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 22 | 4.4 | 22.0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | @ DET |
W 27 - 26 |
20 | 31 | 64.5% | 87.4 | 235 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 19 | 3.2 | 19.0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | vs PIT |
W 24 - 28 |
18 | 26 | 69.2% | 70.5 | 187 | 28 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2.0 | 10 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 10 | vs KC |
L 20 - 10 |
16 | 30 | 53.3% | 80.2 | 163 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3.0 | 13 | 4.3 | 13.0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | @ GB |
L 9 - 34 |
16 | 23 | 69.6% | 106.4 | 176 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6.0 | 27 | 4.5 | 27.0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | vs LV |
L 38 - 14 |
14 | 26 | 53.8% | 68.2 | 173 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6.0 | 40 | 6.7 | 40.0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | vs ARI |
W 13 - 16 |
15 | 33 | 45.5% | 48.5 | 188 | 28 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 24 | 6.0 | 24.0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | @ LAR |
W 27 - 21 |
20 | 27 | 74.1% | 145.2 | 288 | 50 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 28 | 5.6 | 28.0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | @ DEN |
W 25 - 17 |
21 | 28 | 75.0% | 123.6 | 237 | 27 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 4.0 | 7 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | @ SF |
L 31 - 34 |
20 | 24 | 83.3% | 140.9 | 315 | 64 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | vs MIN |
W 20 - 28 |
15 | 22 | 68.2% | 107.7 | 178 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 22 | 3.7 | 22.0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | vs WAS |
W 17 - 31 |
25 | 28 | 89.3% | 124.5 | 309 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3.0 | 9 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 306 | 488 | 62.7% | 89.9 | 3,613 | 64 | 22 | 12 | 42 | 61 | 3.8 | 277 | 4.5 | 17.3 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | ||
Ratings by category